Part of a series on |
The Bible |
---|
![]() |
Biblical canon and books |
Old Testament (OT) New Testament (NT) Hebrew Bible Deuterocanon Antilegomena Chapters and verses |
Development and authorship |
Jewish canon Old Testament canon New Testament canon Mosaic authorship Pauline epistles Johannine works Petrine epistles |
Translations and manuscripts |
Septuagint Samaritan Torah Dead Sea scrolls Masoretic text Targums · Peshitta Vetus Latina · Vulgate Gothic Bible · Luther Bible English Bibles |
Biblical studies |
Dating the Bible Biblical criticism Higher criticism Textual criticism Canonical criticism Novum Testamentum Graece Documentary hypothesis Synoptic problem NT textual categories Historicity
Internal consistencyPeople · Places · Names Archeology · Artifacts Science and the Bible |
Interpretation |
Hermeneutics Pesher · Midrash · Pardes Allegorical interpretation Literalism Prophecy |
Perspectives |
Gnostic · Islamic · Qur'anic Christianity and Judaism Biblical law
Inerrancy · Infallibilityin Judaism · in Christianity Criticism of the Bible |
· ![]() |
New Testament manuscripts in Greek are categorized into five groups.[1] This categorization scheme was introduced in 1981 by Kurt and Barbara Aland in Der Text des Neuen Testaments. The categories are based on how each manuscript relates to the various text-types. Generally speaking, earlier, Alexandrian manuscripts are category I while later, Byzantine manuscripts are category V.
Contents |
This category represents the earliest and best manuscripts. Fourth century and earlier papyri and uncials are in this category, as are manuscripts of the Alexandrian text-type. The manuscripts in this category are important when considering textual problems and are considered to be a good representation of the autograph.
The manuscripts in this category are similar to category I manuscripts, and are important in textual consideration of the autograph. However, the texts usually contain some alien influences, such as those found in the Byzantine text-type. Egyptian texts fall in this category.
The manuscripts in category III are important when discussing the history of the textual traditions and to a lesser degree for establishing the original text. The manuscripts usually contain independent readings, and have a distinctive character. f1, f13 are examples of manuscript families that fall within this category. Manuscripts of this category usually present mixed or eclectic text-type.
Category IV contains the few manuscripts that follow the text of the Codex Bezae (D). These texts are of the Western text-type.
Byzantine and mostly Byzantine texts fall under this category.
See [Aland:159-162].
I | II | III | IV | V | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
150 | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
200 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
250 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0212 | ![]() ![]() |
||
300 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||
350 | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
||
400 | 057 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
450 | 02 (except Gospels), 0254 | ![]() |
02 (Gospels), 032, 062, 068, 069, 0163, 0165 (?), 0166, 0182, 0216, 0217, 0218, 0226, 0227, 0236, 0252, 0261 | 05 | 026, 061 |
500 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|||
550 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
022, 023, 024, 027, 042, 043, 064, 065, 093 (Acts), 0246, 0253, 0265? | ||
600 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
||
650 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
700 | ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||
750 | 019, 0101, 0114, 0156, 0205, 0234 | ![]() |
07, 047, 054?, 0116, 0134 | ||
800 | 044 (Catholic epistles) | 044 (except Catholic epistles) | |||
850 | 33 (except Gospels) | 010, 038, 0155, 0271, 33 (Gospels), 892, 2464 | 012, 025 (except Acts, Rev), 037, 050, 0122, 0128, 0130, 0131, 0132, 0150, 0269, 565 | 09, 011, 013, 014, 017, 018, 020, 021, 025 (Acts, Rev), 030, 031, 034, 039, 041, 045, 049, 053?, 063, 0120, 0133, 0135, 0136?, 0151, 0197, 0248, 0255, 0257, 0272, 0273?, 461 | |
900 | 1841 | 0115, 1424 (Mark) | 1424 (except Mark), 1841 | ||
950 | 1739 | 0177, 0243?, 1739, 1891, 2329 | 051, 075, 0105, 0121a, 0121b, 0140, 0141, 0249, 307, 1582, 1836, 1845, 1874, 1875, 1912, 2110, 2193, 2351 | 028, 033, 036, 046, 052, 056, 0142, 1874, 1891 | |
1050 | 1175, 1243, 2344 | 81, 323, 945, 1006, 1854, 1962, 2298 | 28, 104, 181, 323, 398, 424, 431, 436, 451, 459, 623, 700, 788, 1243, 1448, 1505, 1838, 1846, 1908, 2138, 2147, 2298, 2344, 2596? | 103, 104, 181, 398, 431, 451, 459, 945, 1006, 1448, 1505, 1846, 1854, 2138, 2147, 2298 | |
1100 | 256, 1735 | 1735, 1910 | 256 | ||
1150 | 1241 | 36, 1611, 2050, 2127 | 1 (Gospels), 36, 88, 94?, 157, 326, 330, 346, 378, 543, 610, 826, 828, 917, 983, 1071, 1241, 1319, 1359, 1542b, 1611, 1718, 1942, 2030, 2412, 2541, 2744 | 1 (except Gospels), 180, 189, 330, 378, 610, 911, 917, 1010, 1241, 1319, 1359, 1542b?, 2127, 2541 | |
1200 | 1573 | 1573 | |||
1250 | 2053, 2062 | 442, 579, 1292, 1852 | 6 (CE, Paul), 13, 94, 180, 206, 218 (epistles), 263, 365, 441, 614, 720, 915, 1398, 1563, 1641, 1852, 2374, 2492, 2516, 2542, 2718? | 6 (Gospels, Acts), 94?, 180, 206, 218 (except epistles), 263, 365, 597, 720, 1251?, 1292, 1398, 1642, 1852, 2374, 2400, 2492?, 2516 | |
1300 | 1342 | ||||
1350 | 2427 | 1067, 1409, 1506, 1881 | 5, 209, 254, 429 (Paul), 453, 621, 629, 630, 1523, 1534, 1678?, 1842, 1877, 2005, 2197, 2200, 2377 | 5?, 189, 209, 254, 429 (Paul), 1067, 1409, 1506, 1523, 1524, 1877, 2200 | |
1400 | 2495 | ||||
1450 | 322 | 69, 205, 322, 467, 642, 1751, 1844, 1959, 2523, 2652 | 69, 181, 205, 429 (Rev.), 467, 642, 886, 2523, 2623, 2652? | ||
1500 | 61 (epistles, Rev), 522, 918, 1704, 1884 | 61 (Gospels, Acts), 522, 918, 1704 | |||
1550- | 849, 2544 (Paul) | 2544 (except Paul) |
Century | Category I | Category II | Category III | Category IV | Category V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
II | 3 | ||||
II/III | 6 | ||||
III | 25 | 1 | 2 | ||
III/IV | 8 | 2 | |||
IV | 5 | 8 | 10 | ||
IV/V | 1 | 7 | 7 | ||
V | 2 | 16 | 19 | 1 | 2 |
V/VI | 6 | 6 | |||
VI | 15 | 31 | 12 | ||
VI/VII | 1 | 4 | 3 | ||
VII | 2 | 8 | 17 | 4 | |
VII/VIII | 2 | 1 | |||
VIII | 6 | 12 | 5 | ||
VIII/IX | 1 | 1 | |||
IX | 3 | 7 | 12 | 5 | |
IX/X | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
X | 1 | 5 | 18 | 10 | |
XI | 3 | 7 | 24 | 16 | |
XI/XII | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
XII | 1 | 5 | 24 | 16 | |
XII/XIII | 1 | 1 | |||
XIII | 2 | 4 | 21 | 18 | |
XIII/XIV | 1 | ||||
XIV | 1 | 4 | 17 | 12 | |
XIV/XV | 1 | ||||
XV | 1 | 11 | 9 | ||
XVI | 5 | 4 | |||
XVI/XVII | 2 | 1 |
This system of classification prefers the Alexandrian text-type. Manuscripts that represent the Western text-type are classified as Category IV in Gospels, and Category II/III in the Pauline Letters. This is significant because some scholars believe that some or all of the Minuscule text or the Western texts are closer to the original texts. Some manuscripts are not classified. Uncial 055 is not because it is a commentary, and according to some authorities, written in a minuscule hand. 𝔓7, 𝔓89, 𝔓121, Uncial 080, Uncial 0100, Uncial 0118, 0174, 0230, 0263, 0264, 0267, 0268 are too brief to classify. Uncial 0144 and 0196 are not accessible. 𝔓25 is not classified because of the Diatessaric character of text.
𝔓5 was classified to Category I, but it is not a representative of the Alexandrian text-type. According to Comfort it is "a good example of what Kurt and Barbara Aland call "normal" (i.e. a relatively accurate text manifesting a normal amount of error and idiosyncrasy)".[2]
|